Wednesday, 7 December 2016

A quick look at gendered issues of sanitation...

As I mentioned in my last post, I want to focus a little more on the relationship between gender and sanitation, with a particular focus on the different experiences of men and women in African communities. From the reading that I have done so far to create previous blog posts, there has been one undeniable, inescapable conclusion – women and girls are most likely to bear the brunt of issues arising from inadequate infrastructures for safe water or sanitation provision. Everyone within a community that has poor sanitation provision will experience general, but not insignificant issues, such as increased prevalence of water-borne diseases, and higher mortality rates (Galan et al, 2013). Days that could otherwise be spent working and earning an income will instead be spent trying to recover from the latest bout of diarrhoeal disease, and spending money on medicines. This is likely to be more of an impact that men will experience, as they are generally the more economically productive out of the husband-wife partnership in many African countries (May & Andy, 1997). Everyday, hours that could be spent on education, domestic work or earning a living, are instead spent travelling long distances to find a suitable place to go to the toilet. Men, women and children alike all have to lose this time to the task of relieving themselves, however for women and young girls it can be more arduous and risk-ridden than for men. Vulnerability to attack or harassment, cultural condemnation, and domestic expectations are just three of the perils that women have to juggle on a daily basis when sanitation provision is inadequate.  

People living in extreme poverty can be found in both rural and urban settings, however, contrary to what you might think, issues of inadequate sanitation are often the most prominent in urban slums (Govender et al, 2011). The high population density and lack of urban space mean that its occupants often have to travel further, and for longer to find open spaces to defecate if acceptable sanitation facilities aren't provided. A study by Reddy & Snehalatha (2011) in India found that residents in even the most vulnerable communities made a link between poor sanitation and the presence of disease and disease-carrying vectors, such as mosquitoes. This linkage means that defecating within the streets of the settlements carries with it embarrassment and judgement from other members of the community. To avoid this, people often choose to travel to open spaces as discreetly as they can, or at extremely early or late times of the day when fewest people are around. For women, the least disagreeable option is often to travel in groups at around 4.30 am. This way, they can minimise the risk of attack, or the chance that someone will see them.  

These extreme measures that women have to go to for privacy are even more apparent when they are menstruating. Menstruation is perceived as unclean and dirty, and is often not considered when setting up sanitation facilities within an urban settlement (Abrahams et al, 2011). In India, similar attitudes prevail in urban slum settlements, and here, women use cloths which they change two to three times per day. When these are washed, they are dried only in places where men will not come across them. When the cloths need to be disposed of after a few months, standard practise is to seal them in a bag, and bury them far from the settlements. The few usable toilets in the urban slums of Hyderabad, where the study is set, do not have facilities to dispose of sanitary materials, meaning that women will often choose to clean themselves in an open field, than an actual latrine because they feel it is more private. Although this information is from an Indian context, it is easy to imagine similar conditions within urban slums of Africa, particularly as a study by Abrahams et afound that women do not benefit nearly as much from developmental provision of sanitation as men.  

Female empowerment is an often cited outcome of NGO or government focus on a particular area. However, claiming that female empowerment is a direct result of installing pumps or up to date toilet facilities would be like claiming that an intricate tapestry is made up of just two threads. Female empowerment may face obstacles such as societal attitudes, and much of the population of a traditionally patriarchal community may not know how to accept new female outspokennessThe next post will examine in more detail the ways that the presence, or lack of an adequate water supply can affect female empowerment, beyond simply allowing more time for work or domestic chores.  



2 comments:

  1. Hey Eisha, great informative post.

    The state of sanitation in many urban slums is absolutely heart-breaking. In many of these areas there often aren't enough community toilets and the one that do exist are not properly maintained. What do you think can be done to improve this and who do you think should take on the responsibility (government, the community or non-profits)?

    Look forward to the next post x

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hey Sristi, thanks for your comment!
      Interesting question - and I think that there should be a shared responsibility between the government, community and NGOs. The balance of responsibility will obviously be different depending on various contextual factors specific to each area, but they should all be involved. I also feel that perhaps there is a responsibility within the media to ensure that issues of sanitation are not ignored as they are now, simply because people don't like to deal with the 'dirty' issues. This culture of choosing to ignore inconvenient issues is also prevalent within many governments of developing countries. This can be seen throughout Africa, and Asia also, where people living or squatting on undesignated land are not viewed as the government's responsibility. Some of these slums are well established, and have been contributing to the economy of the city around them for decades, as in the case of Dharavi, Mumbai, yet still receiving very little governmental support. Although this is an Indian case study, I think it illustrates the need for a two-way relationship between areas of urban poverty and the wider, more formal city, rather than a one-way reliance on the products of the urban poor.
      In sum, I think I would say that the greatest responsibility for improving or providing adequate sanitation to the urban poor is with the government - if they can make sure that there is a solid infrastructure for the areas they recognise as formal settlements, then they have an obligation to recognise and make an effort towards catering to the needs of the informal urban poor. When the government is unable to find the resources to do this, then I think NGO action should become less of a supporting factor, and more of a driver of sanitation provision.

      Thanks for your question, and apologies for the slightly ranting nature of my response!

      Delete